Neocloud rankings
CoreWeave ranks first of 51 neoclouds with 89/100, ahead of Crusoe (67.5) and Nebius (58.9). The score weighs six public signals: ClusterMAX tier, contracted power, backlog, capital raised, GPUs and named customers. Crusoe states the most contracted power (6 GW) and the largest backlog ($140B).
Last verified
- 01 CoreWeave 89.0
- 02 Crusoe 67.5
- 03 Nebius 58.9
- 04 Nscale 53.1
- 05 TensorWave 50.7
- 06 IREN 50.2
- 07 Firmus 47.6
- 08 GMI Cloud 45.6
| Ownership | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoreWeave | 13 | 893 | Platinum | 4,6001 | 132,5001 | 10,3011 | — | 121 | public | 2026-11-11 |
| Crusoe | 23 | 67.53 | Bronze | 6,0001 | 140,0001 | 3,9001 | — | 31 | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Nebius | 37 | 58.97 | Platinum | — | 40,0002 | 3,5002 | — | 45 | public | 2026-11-11 |
| Nscale | 46 | 53.16 | Unavailable | 1,3701 | 103,4001 | 3,3603 | 50,0002 | 21 | private | 2026-11-11 |
| TensorWave | 55 | 50.75 | Silver | 2,0003 | — | 5001 | 8,1923 | 14 | private | 2026-11-11 |
| IREN | 63 | 50.23 | Underperforming | 5,0001 | 20,3001 | 5,3601 | — | 21 | public | 2026-11-11 |
| Firmus | 74 | 47.64 | Silver | 9001 | — | 2,0002 | — | 11 | private | 2026-11-11 |
| GMI Cloud | 86 | 45.66 | Silver | — | — | 6681 | 30,0004 | 81 | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Together AI | 94 | 44.74 | Bronze | 2,0001 | — | 8002 | — | 21 | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Core42 | 104 | 37.74 | Participation Ribbon | — | — | 5502 | 76,0001 | — | subsidiary | 2026-11-11 |
| Lambda | 114 | 36.34 | Silver | — | — | 4,4261 | — | 21 | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Verda | 123 | 25.13 | Bronze | — | — | 4501 | — | — | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Hyperbolic | 133 | 20.53 | Participation Ribbon | — | — | 301 | — | 71 | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Lightning AI | 143 | 20.43 | Unavailable | — | — | 1081 | 36,0001 | 71 | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Latitude.sh | 153 | 19.63 | Participation Ribbon | — | — | 5941 | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| WhiteFiber | 163 | 19.33 | Underperforming | 401 | 7291 | 3101 | — | — | public | 2026-11-11 |
| DigitalOcean | 174 | 16.54 | Bronze | — | — | — | — | — | public | 2026-11-11 |
| Gcore | 173 | 16.53 | Bronze | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| GMO GPU Cloud | 173 | 16.53 | Bronze | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| Hyperstack | 173 | 16.53 | Bronze | — | — | — | — | — | subsidiary | 2026-11-11 |
| Moonlite | 173 | 16.53 | Bronze | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| Prime Intellect | 173 | 16.53 | Bronze | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| Vast.ai | 233 | 16.13 | Participation Ribbon | — | — | — | 17,0001 | — | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Runpod | 243 | 163 | Participation Ribbon | — | — | 1001 | — | — | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Neysa | 253 | 12.53 | Participation Ribbon | — | — | — | — | 21 | — | 2026-11-11 |
| OVHcloud | 254 | 12.54 | Underperforming | — | — | — | — | — | public | 2026-11-11 |
| Massed Compute | 272 | 12.22 | Underperforming | — | — | 3001 | — | — | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Shadeform | 283 | 11.53 | Participation Ribbon | — | — | — | — | 11 | — | 2026-11-11 |
| STN | 283 | 11.53 | Participation Ribbon | — | — | — | — | 11 | — | 2026-11-11 |
| Scaleway | 303 | 113 | Unavailable | — | — | — | 5,0001 | 91 | subsidiary | 2026-11-11 |
| Fluidstack | 313 | 10.83 | Unavailable | — | — | 8301 | — | 11 | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Bitdeer AI | 323 | 10.53 | Participation Ribbon | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| BUZZ HPC | 323 | 10.53 | Participation Ribbon | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| Radiant | 323 | 10.53 | Participation Ribbon | — | — | — | — | — | private | 2026-11-11 |
| VESSL | 323 | 10.53 | Participation Ribbon | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| Vultr | 323 | 10.53 | Participation Ribbon | — | — | — | — | — | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Sesterce | 373 | 103 | Unavailable | — | — | — | — | 101 | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Shakti Cloud | 383 | 7.43 | Unavailable | — | — | — | 8,0001 | 41 | subsidiary | 2026-11-11 |
| ChronoScale | 394 | 74 | — | 541 | — | — | — | 21 | public | 2026-11-11 |
| Taiga Cloud | 402 | 6.62 | — | — | — | — | 24,0001 | — | subsidiary | 2026-11-11 |
| Hydra Host | 413 | 4.53 | Underperforming | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| Mithril | 413 | 4.53 | Underperforming | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| PaleBlueDot AI | 413 | 4.53 | Underperforming | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| SHARON AI | 413 | 4.53 | Underperforming | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| TensorDock | 452 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | 31 | — | 2026-11-11 |
| Boost Run | 463 | 03 | Unavailable | — | — | — | — | — | public | 2026-11-11 |
| Cirrascale | 464 | 04 | Unavailable | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| CUDO Compute | 463 | 03 | Unavailable | — | — | — | — | — | private | 2026-11-11 |
| Denvr Dataworks | 463 | 03 | Unavailable | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| Hot Aisle | 464 | 04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
| QumulusAI | 463 | 03 | Unavailable | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026-11-11 |
Questions buyers and investors ask
Which neocloud ranks first?
How is the neocloud ranking calculated?
Each neocloud earns 0 to 100 points on six signals, weighted clustermax tier 30%, contracted power 20%, contracted backlog 15%, capital raised 15%, gpus 10%, named customers 10%. Size signals use a log scale, so 6 GW does not drown out 900 MW. A signal without a verified input scores 0. The full formula and every input sit on the methodology page, and each record page shows its own breakdown.
Which neoclouds rate Platinum in ClusterMAX?
CoreWeave and Nebius are the only neoclouds rated Platinum in SemiAnalysis ClusterMAX 3.0 (23 Sep 2026). The neoclouds rated Silver are Lambda, Firmus, GMI Cloud, TensorWave. See the included providers by ClusterMAX tier.
Which neocloud has the most power under contract?
Which neoclouds have raised the most capital?
Which neoclouds are publicly listed?
CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV), Nebius (NASDAQ: NBIS), IREN (NASDAQ: IREN), WhiteFiber (NASDAQ: WYFI), DigitalOcean (NYSE: DOCN), OVHcloud (null), ChronoScale (NASDAQ: CHRN), Boost Run (NASDAQ: BRUN). Nscale filed its S-1 for a NYSE listing in September 2026. Ranks and quarterly revenue for each: public neoclouds, ranked.
Can a neocloud pay to rank higher?
No. The rank is computed from the data at build time with the published weights, and no field is set by hand. Sponsors get one labelled Featured slot under the table; it never touches a score or a position. Corrections with a public source go to hello@neocloudrankings.com.
How the ranking is built
Full methodologyEvery input comes from a filing, an investor release, the company’s own site or the public SemiAnalysis ClusterMAX 3.0 rating. The small number next to a figure opens its source. An empty cell means we have no verified figure in this dataset, and it scores 0 on that signal.
Rank and score are recomputed from the data on every build; the newest check was 11 Nov 2026. Sort any column to rank on one signal alone. Spot a stale number? Email hello@neocloudrankings.com with the source.
Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with a link to this page: CSV, JSON, llms.txt.